Intradependent Neurodiversity (IN) — Concept Map
Theoretical Framework

Intradependent Neurodiversity (IN)

A multi-level model resolving the neurodiversity paradox — integrating medical deficit and social difference paradigms across four interacting layers of organisation.

The Neurodiversity Paradox

Neurodistinct people possess strategic cognitive strengths yet face disproportionately high rates of unemployment and burnout. IN proposes that this gap is a systemic interaction effect across four levels that neither paradigm alone can resolve.

1
Individual

The strengths side of the paradox — capabilities the system often cannot see, measure, or reward.

includes Strategic Cognitive Strengths — pattern recognition, deep focus, non-linear thinking
co-exists with Impairment in Body Function — a real feature, not only socially constructed
is constrained by Working Memory Limits & sensory processing load pre-filling capacity
Medical thread
This model acknowledges impairment as real — without moralising it as failure.

The integration mechanism: hold both medical deficit and social difference as partial truths, without collapsing into either.

resolves the false binary “deficit vs difference” by treating both as partial and true
names Internalised Cultural Voice — how systemic norms enter the self differently for neurodistinct people
Synthesis thread
This is the model’s core move — and the reason the map is multi-level, not a single intervention pathway.
2
Dyadic

Overload is co-produced in relationships. Interaction norms can amplify strain or unlock strengths.

operates through Manager–Employee relationships — expectations and disclosures are negotiated
creates Legitimacy Strain when competence must be performed via a single interaction style
Social thread
The “gaze” operates here first: in micro-corrections, pauses, tone policing, and credibility tests.
3
Organisational

Norms, evaluation metrics, and knowledge transfer structures decide whether difference becomes an asset or a liability.

relies on Linear Verbal Instruction and time-pressured transfer
can shift toward Distributed Cognition — shared artefacts, visual scaffolds, explicit norms
uses Concept Mapping as one structural intervention (not the whole model)
4
Societal

The macro layer where the paradox becomes predictable: labour markets, credential norms, protections, and enforcement.

maintains Biopsychosocial Isolation when diagnosis is the only sanctioned response
requires Stakeholder Epistemic Authority — neurodistinct people as knowledge-producers
Integration
The resolution is multi-level: impairment supports + barrier removal + cultural change + policy protections.
Neutral structure
Dashed = Dyadic level
Thick bar = Organisational level
Thicker border = Societal level
Orange (#FF6418) = paradox / synthesis signal
Click any card to expand or collapse